A weblog publish written by means of Chris "Spags" Spagnuolo on Barstoolsports.com (which I won't hyperlink to here because they do not deserve the hate-clicks) has drawn the ire of the cyber web these days when he spoke about Rihanna's new "high key thiccness" as a precursor to "a world of girls formed just like the Hindenburg." To be clear, this is fat-shaming nonsense.
advertisement - proceed reading below
within the submit, titled, "Is Rihanna Going to Make Being fats the scorching New trend?", Spagnuolo posits that Rihanna's (apparent) weight profit in a sequence of grainy paparazzi photographs is either the outcome of a "dangerous visual" attitude, "having fun with that good room provider somewhat too long," or pregnancy, as "occurs to the best of us."
The writer, who, once again, is nicknamed Spags, writes that seeing Rihanna "pushing a hundred and eighty" is a "hard world to abdominal" because Rihanna's affect as a cultural tastemaker means these new photos will encourage a world "the place all of the most well liked ladies look like the people in Wall-E. And simply in time for summer time too."
Unsurprisingly, the submit drew criticism, with many upset that Barstool had fat-shamed Rihanna.
advertisement - proceed reading below
commercial - proceed analyzing beneath
Spagnuolo, meanwhile, is now claiming he is being cyberbullied in flip. given that the backlash, the site's founder, Dave Portnoy, has issued a statement saying he was making the govt resolution to delete the blog submit at four:19 p.m. EST (even though the offending tweet advertising the piece has been deleted, as of 5:49 p.m., the long-established put up is still are living). Portnoy has not back Cosmopolitan.com's request for remark.
In his remark, Portnoy weighs in, noting that while he didn't believe the "blog was as bad as many are making it out to be," it wasn't humorous enough for him to need to die on the hill defending it. He says "a lot of feminists now not happy about it."
This non-apology is problematic in its own manner (some ways) because he doesn't truly say there turned into anything wrong with the thesis behind the post in question, simply that Spagnuolo did a foul job with his "jokes."
To be honest I don't think the blog become as dangerous as many are making it out to be, however I'll let you know this. It wasn't that funny both and i could have advised you with absolute sure bet that feminists would hate it and use it as an example of "there goes Barstool being Barstool again". There are only definite themes that you simply better nail in case you're gonna write about them because you know they are hot button considerations for us. So if you're gonna blog about Rihanna gaining weight you improved be humorous as fuck and also you better make it bullet proof. This line right here? "a global of ladies formed just like the Hindenburg loaded into one-piece bathing fits could be on the horizon now that Rihanna is traipsing around accessible searching like she's in a sumo swimsuit."neatly that's neither.
Portnoy then says that there are other authors on the web page whom he would've trusted to write down this accurate identical blog publish without an apology but minimizes the fallout with the aid of asserting that he didn't hire the author in query "to be a personality at Barstool" (in poor health burn, bro) and that "he may still not be writing blogs that we as a corporation emerge as having to defend."
commercial - proceed studying below
here is seemingly an attempt to shift the "oops, mb" from the media company to the author — Spagnuolo — whom he in reality chalks as much as being a novice who overstepped his bounds. Evaluating the possibility and reward of a story isn't the simplest factor that makes you a pretty good leader, as Portnoy suggests in his observation. You could additionally try offering a trustworthy apology that takes possession of your mistake.
replace 5/30: the put up on Barstool has been removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment